Hot topic: Differences between eligibility and enforcementThe NCAA makes a purposeful distinction between determining student-athlete responsibility through an eligibility decision and university culpability through the infractions process. Institutions are accountable for rules violations through the infractions process. Student-athletes are responsible for rules violations through the eligibility process. Reinstatement decisions are independent of the NCAA enforcement structure and typically are made once the facts of the student-athlete’s involvement are determined. Read more |
» 3/12/12 - UNC receives postseason ban, scholarship reductions
» 12/20/11 - Ohio State cited for failure to monitor, receives postseason ban
» 12/16/11 - Former Cal Poly Pomona coaches cited for unethical conduct
» 11/23/11 - NCAA statement on point-shaving allegations
» 11/11/11 - University of Oklahoma Mens Basketball Cited for Violations
» 11/4/11 - Infractions Appeals Committee upholds penalties, most findings for Arizona State University
» 10/12/11 - NCAA statement on Auburn football investigation
» 9/13/11 - Three Ohio State football student-athletes reinstated, must repay benefits
» 9/13/11 - Boise State cited for major violations in five sports
» 5/26/11 - Appeals committee upholds infractions decision for University of Southern California
NCAA selects Joel McGormley to lead NCAA Committee on Infractions staff
DI forum participants laud reforms, but some want slower pace
Working group to recommend expanded violation structure for infractions
DIII presidents experience enforcement in observer role
Thomas will step down as chair of NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions
NCAA statement on Danny Sheridan comments
Nothing but networking for NCAA enforcement staff
NCAA enforcement restructures for greater flexibility
Separating fact from fiction in ‘The Blind Side’
Media members set to experience enforcement