texas_football_will_muschamp_mack_brown_new_coach_in_waiting.jpg

Texas locks up future football coach - | 14:57:23
posted by: Howard Smith

Earlier this week, I was in Austin when Texas named defensive football coordinator Will Muschamp as its head coach-in-waiting. He'll take over when current head coach Mack Brown decides to retire. In a culture where attractive assistant coaches frequently get wooed to head coaching vacancies, schools locking down their future head coaches might become a trend in college sports.

Texas isn't the first school to do this. We saw it at Florida State, where Jimbo Fisher was named as Bobby Bowden's successor. Last year, Arizona name Kevin O'Neill to succeed basketball ball coach Lute Olson. The situation didn't go as smoothly as the school hoped, as neither Olson or O'Neill still remain at the school.

Despite Arizona's situation, naming a head coach in-waiting seems to be a smart practice for athletics departments. Certain criteria should be met - a school is confident it has its future head coach on staff, the current coach is getting near retirement age, the coach-in-waiting is willing to wait and remain loyal to the program, and the school has the financial resources to pay the soon-to-be head coach.

In Texas' case, all of these circumstances were met. Athletics Director DeLoss Dodds is confident he has his future leader in the young and fiery Muschamp. Additionally, the school has the resources to reward Muschamp - his salary will increase to $900,000 beginning in January, making him the highest paid assistant coach in the country.

There's no doubt Muschamp now has remarkable job security, especially in an industry when coaches seem to continually play musical chairs. When Brown retires, Muschamp will get a new five-year contract for an undisclosed amount. With this deal, Texas is committing to Muschamp in an unprecedented fashion, especially considering he has no previous head coaching experience.

An argument could be made that naming a head coach-in-waiting is a risky gamble. It's easy to reward coaches while times are good, like they are currently in Austin. But what will happen if and when the school has a down year?

Remember when Notre Dame gave Charlie Weis a 10-year extension during his first season in 2005? After a couple of recent mediocre seasons, many Irish supporters are beginning to question his contract extension.

There are still a lot of unanswered questions about Texas' situation. How much longer will Brown decide to coach? Could Muschamp still be enticed by another job offer during his coach-elect status? Is it possible Texas might change its mind on Muschamp?

It will be fascinating to see how these issues play out over the next several years. Texas certainly won't be the last school to name a head coach-in-waiting, and it will be interesting to see how widespread a trend this will become in intercollegiate athletics.

One thing is for sure, it was an intriguing time to be at Texas last week when this announcement was made.

Comments

This is just another way to circumvent the hiring process. It eliminates African Americans and other minorities from an open and competitive process. Is there A President in waiting? Better yet is there an Athletic Director in waiting? How many African American coaches are there in waiting in college football. I only make it racial because it is, it looks to be an answer to keep a closed shop as far as major college Head Coaching jobs in football are concerned.

posted by: Alex | 11/21/08

I am not in favor of this. I believe that a school should hire a coach based on recruiting ability, ties to the community, the ability to be personable with everyone associated with the university, and who is not afraid to go against what the experts say or what the percentages say. College football is a very tough sport to coach and I believe that it takes a speical person to build a team and a community and win at the same time.

posted by: Brendan | 11/22/08

I think that naming future head coaches is good in theory for college athletics, although employment laws will differ around the country pertaining to the ability to implement the practice especially at state supported schools. I think that potential benefits far exceed the potential drawbacks.

Potential drawbacks include the ability of creating a mess of the coaching situation that could blowup a "sport" at the university. There could be infighting that creates factions among staff, fans and athletes to one coach or the other. Another problem could be a disagreement in the direction of the program among the current coach and successor. Their motives for decision could be different, with the current coach probably having a more finite or short term approach towards decision making.

All of that can be overcome if the egos are checked at the door and the focus is on building the sport. By having a Coach in-waiting, a college is able to express to potential student athletes that there is going to be stability in the program.

It also allows the university to groom the coach in-waiting and address any shortcomings. Taking a steady approach introducing and increase the coach in-waiting involvement in the non-sports related responsibilities the head coach has. This gives donors the opportunity to grow an attachment to the assistant and dismiss concerns when confronted with having to build a relationship with someone new.

posted by: Daniel S. | 11/22/08

Isn't this about the same as picking your next bride before the divorce from the current?

posted by: J Mattison | 11/23/08

This is either PR, or it is a big pay hike for the so-called "coaches in waiting". Almost all of them will leave prematurely for coaching jobs at other universities.

posted by: Mark Sullivan | 11/23/08

How about the older more experienced coaches on his staff that helped him win the national championship. What a slap in the face.

posted by: Troy | 11/23/08

I agree with the comments made by Alex. A coach in waiting has its advantages and disadvantages. Obviously, having a familiar face associated with the program lends itself well to recruits and alumni and has the potential to benefit the program. The obvious disadvantages are denying other qualified coaches the chance at a head coaching position and openly endorsing a process that is discriminatory.

Institutions of higher learning receiving federal aid (University of Texas does through the state of Texas) should have to follow federal hiring standards. You might not hire a minority but you should at least open the process. This not only applies to Texas, but to Florida State and other programs as well.

posted by: Darrell Davis | 11/23/08

Alex and Darrell aren't living in the real world of college sports. It is so competitive, they have to make moves like Texas & Florida State did. I applaud them for having the foresight. It's a case of, if you aren't in their position, it's easy to critise. If Alex & Darrell were in the positions these college AD & Presidents are in, they would have a different view or a losing football team! Wake up & smell the coffee!

posted by: George | 12/07/08

Alex,

How many white candidates does Grambling St, Prarie View A&M or any of the SWAC schools interview?

posted by: James | 12/15/08

it's like telling a recruit that you will be guarnateed to start if you come to this school..."promising" a coach on a current staff the head job when the current head coach leaves/retires leaves too many unknowns "open"...

i also think it is human nature not to work your hardest when you know something is about to be "handed" to you...

we teach athletes to work hard to get what they want from a sport...but there are NO guarantees for them as players...

so why should a coach be guaranteed a head job?

we send are sending conflicting messages!

posted by: snzuluz | 12/28/08

Post a Comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

CommentsFeaturedRecent
It means that two very good teams with very good coaches made it to the final game.
- Marie
Read Post
Double-a Poll

footer