This entry was written by David Pickle, the NCAA's Managing Director of Publishing.
Almost everybody who follows sports must agree that there are too few head football coaches in Division I's Football Bowl Subdivision. If no new minority hires are made between now and the beginning of next football season, only four of 119 coaches would be African-American. That's clearly unacceptable.
The media is outraged, and properly so.
However justified the anger and frustration are, one has to be struck with the parallels between the problems of college football and those of another highly visible American institution: sports journalism.
It probably is true that the prominence of college football trumps the relative obscurity of newspaper sports editors. It's safe to say that 99 percent of the readers of the local newspaper do not know who the sports editor is, and even fewer care. That's nothing against sports editors; it's just that their chosen field is obscure by nature. Conversely, almost every fan is deeply aware of who is coaching their favorite teams. So, if interest is the standard, then you have to say the problem with college football coaches is a bigger one.
Often, though, the problem in college football is framed in the fact that about half of the FBS student-athletes are black while about 95 percent of the coaches are white. I'm among those who believes that disparity is the heart of the problem. But if almost half of the participants are minorities - and the percentage is certainly higher in some professional sports -- then why are Blacks routinely excluded from directing how they are covered at the nation's newspapers?
Maybe journalists and college administrators should compare notes to solve their mutual problem.