Lack of safety restraints and poorly marked highways were responsible for the deaths of five Bluffton College baseball players, concluded the National Transportation and Safety Board in findings released yesterday. The board reiterated a call it has made since 1960 to study the performance and safety regulations of motorcoaches.
Despite yesterday's finding and a renewed effort in 1999, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration--which is responsible for writing and enforcing safety standards in vehicles--has yet to require installing seatbelts in buses like those used by student-athletes across the country. The reason? "We can't just arbitrarily impose federal regulations without some basis in science," Rae Tyson, a spokesman for the NHTSA told the Dayton Daily News.
Seatbelts were made standard in cars in 1968 and according to the Department of Transportation, the restraints saved 15,383 lives in 2006. Isn't it kind of a no-brainer that seatbelts work? What other scientific proof is the NHTSA after?
"Had any of those recommendations been implemented ... our sons would be alive today," John Betts, whose son David died in the crash, told CNN. " That's not a wish. That's not a fantasy. That's a fact."
Although the highway markings and driver mistakes were found to cause the accident, Betts is right, injury and death may have been prevented if greater safety measure were in place. Many of those who died in the crash were thrown from the bus and seatbelts may have prevented that from happening.
"People ask us would Zachary survive if he had a seatbelt? We'll never know because he never had the opportunity," Dana Arend, mother of one of one of the deceased Bluffton players, told a local television station. "There are no seatbelts on the buses so he never had the opportunity and that really upsets us,".
What do you think? Should seatbelts be mandatory on buses?