Baseball Proposal Makes Sense -
posted by: Josh

Matt Dobbins

The following was submitted by Matt Dobbins, a baseball student-athlete from Jacksonville University and member of the Division I Student-Athlete Advisory Committee.

During this past legislative cycle, a myriad of baseball-specific proposals have swept through my Division I Official Notice. This new legislation is full of changes that will revolutionize college baseball as we know it. Fostered by the Baseball Academic Enhancement Working Group, these proposals aim to decrease the unacceptably low APR in the sport of baseball. However, there is one piece of new baseball legislation that does not affect APR and simultaneously presents a great situation for student athletes.

Proposal No. 07-68 allows baseball walk-ons to be eligible for the one-time transfer exception without having an effect on an institution’s APR. But more importantly, this proposal echoes the mission of the NCAA: to support student-athlete well-being. Currently, baseball walk-ons are forced to sit out a year of competition if they decide to transfer to another Division I institution, which means an additional year with unnecessary monetary expenses for that student-athlete. Should we penalize these student-athletes for taking advantage of greater opportunities for themselves? I think not.

Further, Prop 07-68 forces baseball coaches to make informed decisions when choosing to give walk-ons athletics aid. If a coach decides to award aid to a walk-on, new legislation obliges them to give at least 25 percent equivalency. This presents a dilemma for coaches because they can no longer leisurely toss a book scholarship at a walk-on to persuade them to stay at their institution. Coaches must take a vested interest in their walk-on players via playing time or scholarships, because they will leave otherwise. Does this proposal work in favor of student-athletes? I think so.

Proposal 07-68 cultivates a situation where APR remains unaltered and the needs of the student-athlete will be met. In this momentary period of craziness for collegiate baseball, this proposal provides a little light at the end of the tunnel for baseball student-athletes as we ride this train of transition together.

Comments

You tell it to them straight Matt! Way to go... I agree with you and have your back 100%... as a fellow baller on the diamond across town I know that half of those APR problems are caused by players who get drafted and leave institutions anyway... seems like it's always baseball that gets short changed in the NCAA process... 13 weeks now, and only 50 games... things keep changing we won't even have fall tryouts anymore... just pick guys from the gym and play... ha ha ... jk.. but seriously, good aritcle... good luck in your season... Antonio

posted by: Antonio Franzese | 02/27/08

I don't think ANY college baseball players should have to sit out a year when transferring. How can you ask a guy who is only getting a 25% scholarship to sit out a year? He's having to pay 75% of his college costs while doing it. I think that is ridiculous.

Furthermore, this 11.7 scholarship limitation is insulting to college baseball. Women's softball is getting 13 scholarships and that sport isn't making any money. Baseball is a money-maker, at least in the SEC, but always gets the short end of the stick.

The minimum 25% scholarship deal is also absurd. You're going to give a baseball team a paltry 11.7 scholarships, and then tell them how to use it??? C'mon!!!

I appreciate your optimism, Matt, but you guys are still getting shortchanged.

Eric,
Chattanooga, TN

posted by: Eric Vlietstra | 02/28/08

Post a Comment

 

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

CommentsFeaturedRecent
Maybe this young man will be the next Michael Jordan but if they do not make the proper plan up front they won't make it to the end game.
- Chris
Read Post
Double-a Poll

footer