kevinlove.jpg

No Love In Eugene - | 10:47:02
posted by: Josh

UCLA freshman standout Kevin Love didn't expect to receive many cheers at his father's alma mater when the Bruins played at Oregon last week. But he also didn't expect to be the recipient of brutal and disgusting behavior from Ducks' fans.

Love and his family were subjected to homophobic chants and offensive signs during last week's game at Oregon, where Stan Love starred in the 1970s. To his credit, Love did nothing to react but work hard on the court, leading UCLA to an 80-75 win with 26 points and 18 rebounds.

Oregon Athletics Director Pat Kilkenny left messages with Love, UCLA coach Ben Howland and Athletics Director Dan Guerrero to apologize for the fans' behavior, and Oregon coach Ernie Kent addressed the fans before the next home game with USC.

Fans often like to jeer opposing teams, although it seems like it should be more fun to cheer for your own squad. Just as there is no place for racism in athletics, there should be no place for the type of behavior that transpired last week in Eugene. Universities are places of learning, and hatred and bias have no part in what should be a safe environment.

For what it's worth, Love really does get the last laugh. He's a freshman and he absolutely tattooed Oregon in the frontcourt.

Comments

Sometimes, the coach has to stand up for common decency.

The Oregon coach could have warned the fans he would forfeit the game if the obscene and out-of-bounds jeering didn't stop.

Or, he could have threatened to empty the arena, and played the game before an empty house, despite the loss of revenue.

It's not even a question of authority, it's a moral judgment.

posted by: Larry | 01/30/08

Many of these fans and students forget that these athletes are just like
them: human beings. How would those fans feel if Love made remarks like that towards something they love to do? Sure you can root against the opposing team, but not in such a way that it???s offensive and racial!

posted by: Aaron D. McMichael | 01/30/08

What's great about college basketball is that it's emotionally charged. What's wrong with college basketball is that it is emotionally charged.

Kevin Love grew up an U of O fan. His dad Stan starred there. Oregon was a close second in recruiting, but Kevin made a very personal (and also business) decision to attend UCLA. It just was way too personal for the Oregon fans to attack him and his family.

Boo players if you have to...but the personal stuff is out of bounds. In the end, I know Kevin...he couldn't have handled the situation any better. But obscene and homophobic comments should have no place at a "kid friendly" college basketball game.

Marc Isenberg
moneyplayers.typepad.com

posted by: Marc Isenberg | 01/30/08

Why is the national office staff being used for making "questions of the day"? This is a waste of resources. We already have espn.com.

posted by: Jim Cleveland | 01/30/08

Jim, perhaps a better question is, why are you wasting our time by posting a non sequitur comment to a question that is as important as this? These questions of the day are intended to make people think and debate the issues impacting intercollegiate athletics. Clearly someone at the National Office understands and appreciates the merit of this conversation.

To the larger point, the comments in Oregon were despicable and should not have been tolerated by anyone present. The world of sports should be one without concern for sexual preference, gender, race or religion. It should be a level playing field where everyone feels welcome. It's time we all stand up and decry homophobia as what it is, hate speech.

posted by: MHL | 01/31/08

Waste of resources asking a question that involves a student athlete, the well being of the student athlete, and a university student body?

For some strange reason, I believe they built an organization to help student athletes, rules, governance, and fair play ??? an organization that looks at these incidents. I forget the acronym for it...

Are we to believe that issues of race, sexuality, sportsmanship, and student athletes should have no place online with the NCAA? Oh yea, that's the acronym I was looking for...

For generating a dialogue with the students and the NCAA membership, the 'question of day' seems to be a valid form of communication, wouldn???t you agree? I mean, I am responding to your off-hand comment. With the majority of the student body of any university becoming more entrenched in online environments, this 'waste of time' has merits in engaging this generation of student athletes.

ESPN.com, si.com, someothersportsnewsoulet.com all have these, but where else can a person engage in a forum where the NCAA national office, its membership, and student athletes congregate and look for answers?

Waste of resources ??? please. If the NCAA wasn???t interested in listening to students and membership about this incident, then there would be a problem.

Mr. Cleveland, your post sounds like an older man yelling at kids to get off his lawn musing about 'the good ol days' when there wasn't the 'internets.'

posted by: GL | 01/31/08

Post a Comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

CommentsFeaturedRecent
It means that two very good teams with very good coaches made it to the final game.
- Marie
Read Post
Double-a Poll

footer