Parity, Parity, Parity
-
posted by: Josh

Read the latest from NCAA intern Michael Fly on the state of college basketball.

“Grand Valley State knocks off Michigan State.” “Ohio State goes down to Findlay.” “Gardner-Webb shocks Kentucky in Rupp Arena.” Since these headlines have dominated the college hoops scene in this young season, I have heard the word parity more times than I can count and care to remember. It seems to me that it has become a good way of excusing a lackluster performance by a favored team or something that people hear on television and sports radio so much that it becomes part of their regular vocabulary.

Would Randolph Morris have helped Kentucky?

I am not arguing that parity in college sports does not exist (see Appalachian State over Michigan and the crazy college football season that ensued), but I believe that there is an explanation behind the word that seems to be on the tip of everyone’s tongue from Dick Vitale to my office co-workers.

It’s not that Tom Izzo, Thad Matta, and Billy Gillispie have lost their edge and are therefore losing to much smaller programs. Nor is it that DII and mid-major programs have caught up to larger schools in recruiting, game preparation, and overall talent. If these “excuses” for the parity in college basketball were not enough, some try to explain the success of George Mason and now Gardner-Webb, Findlay, and Grand Valley State by pointing to the fact that powerhouse programs have trouble “getting up” or staying interested enough to play their best against lesser opponents.

Comments

Your thesis can be illustrated even further by the recent lack of success team USA has had in international basketball competition. From top to bottom, the international teams do not have better athletes, however, they play better team basketball and they practice together on a more regular basis. Team basketball and continuity wins games and that is why team USA has taken a hit recently.

All things considered, USA basketball has recognized their inherent deficiency and is working diligently to build a team/program, rather than a collaboration of high-flying athletes. The fundamentals of the game of basketball do not change. The style of play and details of the NBA game have changed from their original days while the international game has stuck to the fundamentals. The NBA game is a product that has been molded and shaped for the consumer. The international game isn't there yet, although the market for basketball is expanding and the international game could follow.

The NBA season is about providing a consumer friendly product on the floor each night in hopes of winning enough games to get into the playoffs. Once in the playoffs, the true personality of the team comes out, which ultimately leads to the most fundamentally sound team winning the NBA title. (AKA: The San Antonio Spurs as of late).

Team USA and USA basketball have recognized their faults and are trying to get back into the market of winning. I hope Team USA continues to improve and brings home the gold in Beijing.

posted by: | 11/12/07

This article shows great insight into the game of college basketball and how it all plays out on the court. Keep writng about what you know and love.

posted by: Dee | 11/13/07

I truly think this has a lot to do with these upsets. I think you are right on with this and it is not to take away from the accomplishment of an upset because at any given time there can be one but it doesn’t happen over an extended time period. Now with the NBA in comparison to international, the players that play international have gotten much better. They are not unequals anymore. Look at the NBA rosters that are full of international players. There is more of a team philosophy but it is allowed because of the rules also. The NBA is set to show an individual’s talents because of the defenses that they are not allowed to play. There is the defensive 3 seconds call that eliminates good helpside D. But that's another story. As for college it is interesting to see these upsets but I would like to see what the numbers are of mid-majors beating majors over the last 10 years to see if in fact is really more at this time.

posted by: JM | 11/13/07

Great stuff Michael. Value point of experience and continuity over inexperience and new talent coming in every few years. That's truly how the mid majors win is because of their years of playing together over a long period of time. If the BCS schools had their star players through their junior year, we would probably see less upsets. Keep up your writing and love for college basketball.

posted by: Reggie | 11/23/07

Post a Comment





Double-a Poll

footer