Roar Of The NCAA Membership -
posted by: Josh

If ever you doubted that the NCAA was a membership-driven organization, you may now consider your fears allayed. The NCAA national office has received enough override requests to require the Division I Board of Directors to reconsider adoption of three proposals at its upcoming August meeting.

The controversial proposals relate to the elimination of electronic communication with prospective student-athletes (other than e-mail or fax), the change of financial aid distribution in the sport of baseball and dates-of-competition legislation for men’s and women’s golf.

Thirty override votes are needed for the Board to reconsider a proposal. If the Board decides to uphold its previous decision, the piece of legislation will be considered by the Division I membership in a one-school, one-vote capacity at the annual Convention in January. If the Board amends any of the proposals, a new 60-day window is opened for the membership to enact another override.

I think the Board made an excellent decision with the elimination of text messaging, as student-athletes reported that the recruiting practice adversely affected their lives. With regard to baseball, the Board increased minimum scholarship allotments to 33 percent per player. This has been quite controversial in the baseball community, but I like it – something needs to be done to help fix the academic struggles afflicting baseball student-athletes.

We will make sure to examine each of the controversial pieces of legislation prior to the Board of Directors meeting in August and before the NCAA Convention this winter.

Comments

To your comment "something needs to be done to help fix the academic struggles afflicting baseball student-athletes."

That something is APR. Here we go tinkering with rules with the express purpose and popular at the moment purpose of fixing the academic struggles of student-athletes. Let APR have a chance to work before messing with it in certain sports.

The rest of the baseball reform package is equally absurd, but most decided to speak out on limiting the financial aid numbers in hopes of only giving monies to better students.

If it is time to add baseball to the one time transfer rule list of those sports that cannot use it, then I believe it is time for the rule itself to be rescinded.

This brings me to my last point. The manual would be quite smaller and easier to monitor if the membership would look at rules designed for only one sport and determine if that is really necessary of not. If a particular calling rule is good for football, then why isn't it good enough for cross country?

posted by: Michael | 06/28/07

It is absurd that baseball only has 11.7 scholarships so why waste time arguing about the new proposed changes? Coaches, fans, players, families should focus their efforts to make a key change in the number of scholarships allowed. The scholarship disparity between baseball and other sports is the big white elephant sitting in the room. Accept the "new" limits IF 3-5 more scholarships are allowed.

posted by: taxi | 06/30/07

Post a Comment

 

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

CommentsFeaturedRecent
Sox-Yankees happens 18 times a year; this is Figgy's second major league start in four years. Always take the chance to see something you've never seen before.
- Adam
Read Post
Double-a Poll

footer