Is it more important for your favorite team to contend for a national championship or graduate its players at a high rate? Do you take more pride in your alma mater???s academics or athletics success?
I was involved in a conversation on a message board earlier where fans were calling for a football coach???s head after his team suffered a crushing defeat on Saturday. I understand the frustration of the fans, but entered the conversation to suggest that the coach has taken care of business off the field and recruits players who represent the school with pride in the classroom.
To say that I got laughed out of town is the understatement of the year. It became apparent that every fan on that message board was more concerned with an extra football victory than an impressive academic progress rate.
I don???t want to appear naïve; I root my heart out for Syracuse every time I watch the Orange play. I danced all night after they won the 2003 national title, but I also celebrated that starting center Craig Forth was a four-time academic all-American. I appreciated that some of the student-athletes on the team focused just as much, if not more, on their academic pursuits than on their athletics endeavors.
Athletics success is important and I am in no way suggesting that coaches shouldn???t be held accountable for poor performance on the court or field. I do believe, however, that coaches should be lauded for recruiting high quality student-athletes who perform to the best of their abilities both on and off the field. Fans should cheer these academic accolades heartily.
As a Brandeis graduate, I take pride in my degree and in the athletics success of my alma mater. For me, the two have always gone hand in hand. Coaches who win at all costs have no place working in the college game. It is a coach???s responsibility to encourage his players to reach their potential as students, athletes and as people.
Many fans ignore the fact that academic success is more important than athletics success, and I have a hard time understanding that philosophy.