How Should Coaches Be Evaluated? - | 13:19:32
posted by: Josh

Is it more important for your favorite team to contend for a national championship or graduate its players at a high rate? Do you take more pride in your alma mater???s academics or athletics success?

I was involved in a conversation on a message board earlier where fans were calling for a football coach???s head after his team suffered a crushing defeat on Saturday. I understand the frustration of the fans, but entered the conversation to suggest that the coach has taken care of business off the field and recruits players who represent the school with pride in the classroom.

To say that I got laughed out of town is the understatement of the year. It became apparent that every fan on that message board was more concerned with an extra football victory than an impressive academic progress rate.

I don???t want to appear naïve; I root my heart out for Syracuse every time I watch the Orange play. I danced all night after they won the 2003 national title, but I also celebrated that starting center Craig Forth was a four-time academic all-American. I appreciated that some of the student-athletes on the team focused just as much, if not more, on their academic pursuits than on their athletics endeavors.

Athletics success is important and I am in no way suggesting that coaches shouldn???t be held accountable for poor performance on the court or field. I do believe, however, that coaches should be lauded for recruiting high quality student-athletes who perform to the best of their abilities both on and off the field. Fans should cheer these academic accolades heartily.

As a Brandeis graduate, I take pride in my degree and in the athletics success of my alma mater. For me, the two have always gone hand in hand. Coaches who win at all costs have no place working in the college game. It is a coach???s responsibility to encourage his players to reach their potential as students, athletes and as people.

Many fans ignore the fact that academic success is more important than athletics success, and I have a hard time understanding that philosophy.

Comments

Sounds like you went to a Ford message board and wanted to talk about how nice the Chevy's were.

Might want to invite those sports fans over to the always hopping college academic-based message boards to discuss that in the future.

posted by: mike | 09/25/06

You are free to evaluate coaches in any manner you choose. Not knowing what specific game you are referring to makes it difficult to discuss. Certainly there are instances where coaches make poor game decisions that can be costly. If this is such an incident, the fans certainly have the right to complain about the coach, regardless of the academic prowess of the team. After all, isn't that the school administration's business?

posted by: jerry hatch | 09/26/06

I agree with Josh, every student has the ability and I???m sure wants to root for his or her home team, but college wasn't built on athletics alone. You need to have a firm base of academics before you can even comprehend the fundamentals of any sport. Coaches, trainers, and organization leaders have two responsibilities to each and every player. They must help the individual to first strive in the academic world before they can work with the group to mold a team, because without the capacity to think critically where will they go?

Second, if they (the student) have proved they can excel in that they can maintain a balance between academics and athletics and that the coaches who I hope are more then a coach, but also an instructor in the university, will help them to strive first for the grade not just a goal. Coaches must push them to go above their potential, in the classroom and on the field. If you are able to gain respect, then you can prove to be a great influence to the individual, and that's where the true ability of a coach and teacher will come to play.

posted by: Evan Johnson | 09/26/06

I agree with you in theory that education should be the primary focus of college athletics. Student-athletes who are able to balance the demands that are put on them athletically and academically should be commended. Like I have posted before, being a former coach, I agree that a coach???s ultimate focus is to be a solid mentor and provide guidance for their student-athletes. The problem though is that is not reality. I know many coaches over my 12 years in college athletics that were released by their institutions for win-loss performance. I do not know one that was released for not graduating kids but won. That is the way coaches are evaluated day in and day out. I understand what institutions say but rarely do they stand up to the pressure from alumni who call for a coach???s job over win-loss records. I also think it is great that you were excited over the four-time academic all-American at Syracuse but I am willing to say that it didn't make front page news. That's the problem we have with the whole situation. Scores and records are front page news. It's unfortunate but reality.

posted by: seph | 09/26/06

???I agree that athletics success is important and I am in no way suggesting that coaches shouldn???t be held accountable for poor performance on the court or field. I do believe, however, that coaches should be lauded for recruiting high quality student-athletes who perform to the best of their abilities both on and off the field. Fans should cheer these academic accolades heartily.???

I don???t believe that a coach should ever play people because of their name. I think position should be earned in practice.

posted by: mike elmore | 09/26/06

Post a Comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

CommentsFeaturedRecent
It means that two very good teams with very good coaches made it to the final game.
- Marie
Read Post
Double-a Poll

footer